Bartlett outed. this is wrong.
By ZTN Posted in User Blogs — Comments (7) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
I read this article today. I find it unfortunate that a long conservative who served under Reagan would get fired for being critical of Bush.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/13/politics/13letter.html?_r=1&oref=slog
in
An Outspoken Conservative Loses His Place at the Table
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
GREAT FALLS, Va. -- What happens if you're a Republican commentator and you write a book critical of President Bush that gets you fired from your job at a conservative think tank?
For starters, no other conservative institution rushes in with an offer for your analytical skills.
"Nobody will touch me," said Bruce Bartlett, author of the forthcoming "Impostor: Why George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy." "I think I'm just kind of radioactive at the moment."
Mr. Bartlett, a domestic policy aide at the White House in the Reagan administration and a deputy assistant treasury secretary under the first President Bush, talked last week at his suburban Washington home about his dismissal, his book and a growing disquiet among conservatives about Mr. Bush.
more at the link.
And I'm honestly saying this without sarcasm, are there any examples of someone on the other side of the isle writing something like "Paying the horrible price for the Clinton years" and still having an official seat at the table?
The closest I can come up with is Steph.
I don't know a lot about Bartlett. I do know that Pat Buchanan was once a cabinet level Reaganite as well, and he kind of wandered off into uncharted territory long before Bush was elected. Another Reagan-man is running for senator in VA as a Democrat. Both probably insist they're keeping true to their beliefs and the party has changed, not them (a la Zell Miller), but I'm not sure most would agree with them.
The Democrats love those type of guys, just ask Joe Lieberman.
He didnt think there would be a backlash?
But the publicity and his new martyred status, should help him sell lots of books.
There may be a bit more to the story than the Times is sharing. It may take some time to research. It may be found with about an hour's worth of serious looking and reading. It may be done faster by reading Bartlett's columns from 2002 on, and working your way through what other conservatives were saying about him, and what the Times has been saying about him for two or three years. It may be that I expect pigs to fly before you or your less masochistic co-idealists actually research this point.
And no, I'm not helping you with this one.
If he's anti-Bush, his motives are pure and he's clean as a whistle.
I think you meant "ousted", not "outed". Unless you know something else....
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
The Fannie/Freddie situation is truly outlandish...
by blackheddLOL!
by Rod PatrickI have no other words...
by tsquareNew One: Pennsylvania: Dozen
by dld1717dglenn nt
by dglennGeneration Gap (Cont'd)
by nivlemI just got a phone call from Arnold..
by speciallistThis is a very winnable race
by dld1717I didn't think a west coaster could pull it off..LOL
by speciallistGeneration gap
by nivlemThanks...
by RottDawgspeciallist
by simpson316Also bogus ...
by LeverkuhnThere never was a 15 point lead ...
by LeverkuhnAre we there yet?
by 29VictorIn a perfect world
by Chris-64Neil says, One more step to Redstate 3.0
by speciallistFnord. (n/t)
by FinrodOh believe me
by Chris-64
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



Bartlett is certainly not the first longtime conservative or administration insider to get blackballed for speaking out against the administration.
I'm kind of surprised that Bartlett is that surprised.